![]() For my application, I am not worried about speed. Of course you and Matt are right about the execution speed. > Although you don't "like" it, it could be more efficient. > After some nice solutions have been found, could you be so kind and compare the execution speed with a simple loop? I can do it with a loop, but I have somehow got myself into the CELLFUN habit and don't much like the look of the loop: > I am trying to figure out a way to replace values in a cell array with NaN. ![]() The logic behind the algorithm seems to be as follows: > %now if I want to replace values greater than 0.5 in each cell I could: > CELLFUN habit and don't much like the look of the loop: I can do it with a loop, but I have somehow got myself into the I am trying to figure out a way to replace values in a cell array with
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |